Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
1951 Reform Movement
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== The Reform Coalition == The reformers built their coalition from diverse elements united by disgust with machine corruption. Civic organizations like the Greater Philadelphia Movement, formed by business leaders who believed good government would promote economic development, provided resources and respectability. The Americans for Democratic Action, a liberal organization that included union leaders and intellectuals, contributed ideology and energy. African American voters, frustrated by a machine that took their votes but gave them little in return, increasingly supported reform. Middle-class professionals, especially in newer residential areas, saw reform as a way to improve city services and restore Philadelphia's reputation.<ref name="peirce">{{cite book |last=Peirce |first=Neal R. |title=The Megastates of America |year=1972 |publisher=W.W. Norton |location=New York}}</ref> The reformers' campaign combined detailed policy proposals with dramatic attacks on corruption. Clark promised a new city charter that would modernize government and protect against patronage abuse. Dilworth, running for district attorney, launched blistering critiques of Republican corruption, naming names and citing specific scandals. The reformers portrayed themselves as modern, professional, and honest—in contrast to a machine they depicted as antiquated, corrupt, and incompetent. The message resonated with voters who had watched other American cities modernize while Philadelphia stagnated. The election became a referendum on whether Philadelphia would embrace change or continue with the status quo.<ref name="reichley"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philadelphia.Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Philadelphia.Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
1951 Reform Movement
(section)
Add topic