Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Consolidation Era Politics
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Political Interests and Conflicts == The fragmented governmental structure served certain political and economic interests, which made consolidation controversial. Each municipality had its own patronage positions—constables, aldermen, commissioners—that provided jobs and influence for local political organizations. Rural townships resisted being absorbed into an urban government that might impose higher taxes without providing commensurate services. Working-class neighborhoods feared domination by wealthy downtown interests, while business leaders worried that consolidated government would be more susceptible to immigrant political machines. Ethnic and religious tensions complicated the picture: the districts that had experienced the worst violence during the [[Nativist Riots of 1844]] were precisely those with the most contentious relationships between native-born and immigrant populations.<ref name="warner"/> The Democratic and Whig parties had different bases of support across the county's municipalities, adding partisan dimensions to debates over consolidation. Democrats drew strength from immigrant neighborhoods in Kensington, Moyamensing, and Southwark, while Whigs were stronger in the commercial core and native-born districts. Consolidation would change the balance of power between these constituencies, giving both parties reason to calculate how unified governance might affect their electoral prospects. The violence of the 1840s, however, created pressure from business interests, civic reformers, and respectable citizens of all parties who demanded that government be made capable of maintaining order.<ref name="steinberg"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philadelphia.Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Philadelphia.Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Consolidation Era Politics
(section)
Add topic