Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Political Machine Era
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Reform Challenges == Reform movements periodically challenged machine dominance but rarely achieved lasting success until 1951. The Committee of One Hundred, organized in 1880, helped topple the Gas Ring but could not sustain its influence. The City Party of the early 1900s elected reform mayors but found itself unable to dislodge the machine's control of the council and row offices. Progressive reformers achieved some structural changes—a new city charter in 1919 streamlined government and eliminated some patronage positions—but the machine adapted and survived. Reformers' weakness was their inability to provide voters with the tangible benefits that the machine delivered; good government was an abstraction, while jobs and favors were concrete.<ref name="reichley"/> Lincoln Steffens' 1903 exposé in McClure's Magazine, later published in "The Shame of the Cities," made Philadelphia a national symbol of municipal corruption. Steffens described a city where politics was pure business, where voters sold their ballots for two dollars, where contractors paid bribes for every project. His portrait was exaggerated but contained enough truth to wound civic pride. The article helped inspire reform efforts, though these achieved limited success against the entrenched machine. Steffens identified a fundamental problem: reformers appealed to abstract principles while the machine appealed to immediate self-interest. Until reformers could offer voters something more than good intentions, the machine would survive.<ref name="steffens">{{cite book |last=Steffens |first=Lincoln |title=The Shame of the Cities |year=1904 |publisher=McClure, Phillips |location=New York}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philadelphia.Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Philadelphia.Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Political Machine Era
(section)
Add topic