Jump to content

Pre-Contact Settlements

From Philadelphia.Wiki

Pre-contact settlements in the Philadelphia region encompass the villages, camps, and seasonal gathering sites established by the Lenape people and their ancestors over thousands of years before European arrival in the 17th century. Archaeological evidence demonstrates continuous human habitation in the Delaware Valley for at least 12,000 years, from the earliest Paleo-Indian hunters who followed game into the region after the last Ice Age through the complex horticultural societies encountered by Swedish, Dutch, and English colonists. While no intact Lenape villages survive—the landscape having been transformed by nearly four centuries of urban development—archaeological sites throughout Philadelphia continue to yield evidence of indigenous occupation.[1]

Archaeological Evidence

[edit | edit source]

Archaeological investigations in Philadelphia and the surrounding region have documented thousands of years of indigenous habitation. The earliest evidence dates to the Paleo-Indian period (approximately 12,000-10,000 years ago), when small bands of hunters pursued megafauna such as mastodons and caribou across a landscape still recovering from glaciation. Stone tools from this period, including distinctive fluted Clovis points, have been found at sites throughout the Delaware Valley, though none have been conclusively identified within Philadelphia's current boundaries. These earliest inhabitants were highly mobile, following game across vast territories and leaving behind scattered traces of their campsites.[2]

The Archaic period (approximately 10,000-3,000 years ago) saw increasing population density and more varied subsistence strategies as the climate warmed and stabilized. Archaic peoples in the Philadelphia region exploited a wider range of food sources, including fish, shellfish, nuts, and smaller game. Archaeological sites from this period are more numerous and substantial, with some showing evidence of repeated seasonal occupation over centuries. The Abbott Farm site near Trenton, New Jersey, just north of Philadelphia, is one of the most significant Archaic sites in the region, demonstrating intensive occupation of the Delaware River floodplain during this period.[3]

Village Locations

[edit | edit source]

By the Late Woodland period (approximately 1,000-400 years ago), the ancestors of the historic Lenape had developed a settlement pattern that would persist until European contact. Villages were typically located near waterways, which provided fish, transportation, and access to the rich floodplain soils suitable for agriculture. The Delaware and Schuylkill Rivers, along with their tributaries such as the Wissahickon, Pennypack, and Cobbs Creeks, would have supported numerous settlements. Villages varied in size from small hamlets of a few families to larger communities of several hundred people, with populations shifting seasonally according to resource availability.[4]

Specific village locations within the boundaries of modern Philadelphia are difficult to identify with certainty. Early colonial records mention Lenape settlements at Shackamaxon (in present-day Fishtown), Passyunk (in South Philadelphia), and Wicaco (near present-day Queen Village), but these references are often vague about precise locations. The site of Shackamaxon, where William Penn legendarily concluded a treaty with the Lenape, was marked by a great elm tree that survived until 1810. Penn Treaty Park now commemorates this location, though the extent of the original village is unknown. Similarly, the village of Passyunk gave its name to the area of South Philadelphia through which Passyunk Avenue runs, but the village itself was displaced before detailed records could be made.[5]

Settlement Patterns

[edit | edit source]

Lenape villages were not permanent, year-round settlements in the European sense. Rather, the Lenape practiced a seasonal round of movement that took them to different locations throughout the year according to resource availability. Spring might find families at fishing camps along rivers where shad and other fish made their spawning runs. Summer villages, typically the largest and most substantial settlements, were located near agricultural fields where women cultivated corn, beans, and squash. Fall and winter saw dispersal into smaller hunting camps in the interior forests, where men pursued deer, bear, elk, and smaller game. This flexible settlement pattern allowed the Lenape to exploit the full range of resources available in the Delaware Valley ecosystem.[1]

Village structures reflected this mobility. Rather than permanent buildings, the Lenape constructed wigwams (domed structures of bent saplings covered with bark or mats) and, in some cases, longhouses (larger rectangular structures housing multiple families). These buildings could be constructed relatively quickly from locally available materials and abandoned when groups moved to seasonal camps. Archaeological evidence suggests that some village sites were occupied repeatedly over generations, even if not continuously, with families returning to the same locations year after year when seasonal resources made that advantageous.[4]

Archaeological Sites in Philadelphia

[edit | edit source]

Urban development has destroyed or buried most archaeological sites within Philadelphia, but some evidence of indigenous occupation has been recovered during construction projects and systematic excavations. Sites along the Delaware and Schuylkill Rivers have yielded stone tools, pottery fragments, and other artifacts dating from various periods of pre-contact occupation. The areas around the mouths of tributary streams—such as Cohocksink Creek (now buried beneath Northern Liberties), Pegg Run (in South Philadelphia), and the Wissahickon—would have been particularly attractive settlement locations and have produced archaeological finds when disturbed by development.[6]

The Philadelphia Archaeological Forum and the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission work to document and preserve archaeological resources within the city. Environmental review requirements sometimes mandate archaeological surveys before major construction projects, leading to the discovery of previously unknown sites. However, the vast majority of the city's archaeological heritage has been destroyed without documentation, lost beneath the foundations of buildings, roads, and infrastructure constructed without awareness of or concern for indigenous remains. What survives represents only a tiny fraction of the evidence that once existed for pre-contact settlement in the Philadelphia region.[7]

Displacement and Loss

[edit | edit source]

The arrival of European colonists beginning in the 1630s initiated the rapid displacement of the Lenape from their settlements in the Philadelphia region. Swedish, Dutch, and English colonists established their own communities on or near existing Lenape villages, drawn to the same favorable locations that had attracted indigenous settlement. The spread of European diseases, for which the Lenape had no immunity, devastated the indigenous population. Land sales and the infamous Walking Purchase of 1737 transferred control of the remaining Lenape territories to colonial authorities. By the mid-18th century, few if any Lenape remained in the immediate Philadelphia area, their villages abandoned or transformed beyond recognition.[8]

The physical traces of pre-contact settlement were quickly obscured by colonial development. Fields that had been cleared by Lenape farmers were converted to European agricultural use. Village sites were built over with colonial structures. The very success of Penn's "greene countrie towne" ensured that little visible evidence of indigenous occupation would survive. Today, understanding pre-contact settlement in Philadelphia requires piecing together fragmentary archaeological evidence, early colonial observations, and comparative analysis with better-preserved sites elsewhere in the region. This work continues to reveal the depth and complexity of human history in the Delaware Valley before European colonization.[1]

See Also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]